 |
Book Summary InformationAuthor: Lucius Annaeus Seneca Brand: Penguin Group USA Translator: Robin Campbell Introduction: Robin Campbell Edition: Paperback Audio: English (Unknown); English (Original Language); English (Published) Published: 1969-07-30 ISBN: 0140442103 Number of pages: 254 Publisher: Penguin Books
Book Reviews of Letters from a Stoic (Penguin Classics)Book Review: Sometimes, yes...sometimes, no... Summary: 4 Stars
That title perhaps sounds like "hot" and "cold" running Seneca -- but it is rather a personal guide to how I believe one should approach Seneca and his advice in these "Moral Letters." My own interest in wanting to know more about him and to read about him came from two sources -- one of them was the several mentions of him by Herman Melville in his works -- and the other was the suggestion in the Oxford World's Classics edition of Petronius' SATYRICON that Trimalchio and those of his sort as depicted by Petronius might be based on the types of individuals pointed out by Seneca in his letters (p. xxix). In the first chapter of MOBY-DICK, Ishmael (the narrator) talks about how he goes to sea -- and how he is able to bear it. He says: "No, when I go to sea, I go as a simple sailor, right before the mast, plumb down into the fore- castle, aloft there to the royal mast-head. True, they rather order me about some, and make me jump from spar to spar, like a grasshopper in a May meadow. And, at first this sort of thing is unpleasant enough. It touches one's sense of honor.... The transition is a keen one, I assure you, from a schoolmaster to a sailor, and requires a strong decoction of Seneca and the Stoics to enable you to grin and bear it. But even this wears off in time." According to the Introduction in this edition by Penguin Classics (translated and with an Introduction by Robin Campbell), there were 124 letters written to Lucilius Junior, "a native of Pompeii, a hard-working higher civil servant (procurator in Sicily at the time) who appears to have dabbled in literature and philosophy." (p. 12) There appear to be 42 of the letters included in this edition. The negative, here, is that the letters are numbered with Roman numerals, and there is no subtitle or parenthetical information before the letters to tell what the subject matter is. One has to "know" the letters by tradition and familiarity in order to know which number to go to in order to find Seneca's views and advice on certain topics. The translator (Robin Campbell) gives his justification for the selection of the particular letters in his "Introduction." He says, "It may be asked what criteria have been applied in deciding which letters should be included or omitted. The first has been their interest -- as they set out a philosophy and contribute to a picture of a man and of his time. The second has been the avoidance of undue repetition of particular themes or topics of a moralist who tends towards repetitiveness." (p.28) The exasperation with Seneca comes with his dual nature -- he is both "social man," and "thinking (principled) man." And occasionally he recognizes that those two things may be in conflict, and may be cause for making choices -- but he also tries to be "practical" in his view of man's being also a social being, and thus having to have contact and social interaction with others of his species. Sometimes his advice on this latter course seems temporizing, tedious, and questionable. Here is the Seneca who is the temporizer, the go-along-to-get-along dissembler. He quite rightly tells his reader not to merely ape the outward disdain of conventional dress and manners simply to get attention, trying to convince others of his "better" nature. Perhaps he should have stopped here, and told his reader that reform of the self was what he should aim at -- but there seemed to be the tutor or teacher in Seneca, so he seemed prone to think he had a mission to reform others as well. "The very name of philosophy, however modest the manner in which it is pursued, is unpopular enough as it is: imagine what the reaction would be if we started dissociating ourselves from the conventions of society. Inwardly everything should be different, but our outward face should conform with the crowd [unh-hunh; strangely this does not synch with what he says later about how one's individual attitudes and values can be warped and worsened by mere association of time with the crowd and its amusements!]. * * * Let our aim be a way of life not diametrically opposed to, but better than that of the mob. Otherwise we shall repel and alienate the very people whose reform we desire; we shall make them, moreover, reluctant to imitate us in anything for fear they may have to imitate us in everything. The first thing philosophy promises us is the feeling of fellow- ship, of belonging to mankind and being members of a community; being different will mean the abandoning of that manifesto." [Letter V, p. 37.] It is no wonder that Melville moved away from Seneca after MOBY-DICK, especially after the crowd (the reading public and the critics) had rejected him. There was too much of the alienated, wounded, grieving loner in Melville, anyway, to feel totally comfortable with someone like Seneca and his moral/worldly dichotomy. The letters that appealed the most to me were the ones concerning "reading" and "the effect of crowds." Here is some of Seneca's advice on reading: "You should be extending your stay among writers whose genius is unquestionable, deriving constant nourishment from them if you wish to gain anything from your reading that will find a lasting place in your mind. To be everywhere is to be nowhere. People who spend their whole life travelling abroad end up having plenty of places where they can find hospitality but no real friendships. The same must needs be the case with people who never set about acquiring an intimate acquaintanceship with any one great writer, but skip from one to another, paying flying visits to them all." [Letter II, p. 33] And here is his observation about the effect of "going along with the crowd." "Associating with people in large numbers is actually harmful: there is not one of them that will not make some vice or other attractive to us, or leave us carrying the imprint of it or bedaubed all unawares with it. * * * But nothing is as ruinous to the character as sitting away one's time at a show -- for it is then, through the medium of entertainment, that vices creep into one with more than usual ease. What do you take me to mean? That I go home more selfish, more self-seeking, and more self-indulgent? Yes, and what is more, a person crueller and less humane through having been in contanct with human beings. * * * When a mind is impressionalbe and has none too firm a hold on what is right, it must be rescued from the crowd: it is so easy for it to go over to the majority. * * * such is the measure of the inability of any of us, even as we perfect our personality's adjustment, to withstand the onset of vices when they come with such a mighty following." [Letter VII, pp. 41-42.] Read for yourself -- decide for youself how large or small a "decoction of Seneca" is salutary for the soul -- or not.
Summary of Letters from a Stoic (Penguin Classics)A philosophy that saw self-possession as the key to an existence lived 'in accordance with nature', Stoicism called for the restraint of animal instincts and the severing of emotional ties. These beliefs were formulated by the Athenian followers of Zeno in the fourth century BC, but it was in Seneca (c. 4 BC - AD 65) that the Stoics found their most eloquent advocate. Stoicism, as expressed in the Letters, helped ease pagan Rome's transition to Christianity, for it upholds upright ethical ideals and extols virtuous living, as well as expressing disgust for the harsh treatment of slaves and the inhumane slaughters witnessed in the Roman arenas. Seneca's major contribution to a seemingly unsympathetic creed was to transform it into a powerfully moving and inspiring declaration of the dignity of the individual mind.
Letters & Correspondence Books
|
 |
|
|
|