 |
Book Summary InformationAuthor: Francine Thomas Howard Edition: Hardcover Audio: English (Unknown); English (Original Language); English (Published) Published: 2010-03-16 ISBN: 0982555067 Number of pages: 288 Publisher: AmazonEncore
Book Reviews of Page from a Tennessee JournalBook Review: The sad truth of how it used to be Summary: 4 Stars
Thank you Amazon for publishing this book!!
It's a powerful and compelling read, and what's more important, the protags are fully fleshed out, so that a reader can get more than one perspective of the timeperiod. Even though the novel is fiction, much of it is fact based history on the way both races, white and black dealt with each other.
On a personal note, I'd once asked my mom about the tall, slender white man in our family album. That's when she told me he was her grandfather, and he was considered black. So I suspect if both black and whites think about it, there's probably someone they have heard of or know about from their family history who's a fair representation of both races.
Anyway, back to this impressive debut novel. As much as I was disappointed with THE HELP, I wasn't with this book.
I'd say both this one and Mudbound are more closely aligned, since:
* * * * * * * *
SPOILERS!!!! if you haven't read the book you may not want to read further!
Both books have a main female protag who's hard working and is emotionally (though in PFATJ, Annalaura is physically abandoned by her husband as well) distanced from their husbands.
I think this is crucial in setting up how each woman deals with her situation at a time where women were repressed and race determined your station in life.
While THE HELP has gotten much of the attention and accolades (sorry, imho THE HELP has so many flaws that I had to start a discussion thread about it on the book's discussion forum) Francine Howard's PFATJ is the more earnest and historically accurate, even in dialogue between the white and black characters.
Please understand, that while some may bring up William Faulkner or even Harper Lee, and while I'm a big fan of those authors, It's 2010 and about time a book was written with a black woman as the main character, and especially one whose thoughts about race and her place in society and especially her feelings over two men of different races are so clearly revealed.
A powerful scene from the book resonated with me starting on page 18:
"Those the only pickaninnies you got with you?" The words coming out of McNaughton's mouth lacked the same bite as the earlier ones, and to white ears, may have been heard as soothing.
But not to Annalaura. Without calculating the impact of her every word, she lifted her chin, and for a brief instant, looked directly into this white man's face. Her own inside warning system pounded through her ears, but her words came out faster than she could listen.
"I have four children, sir." Even though talking proper to a white man could earn her a good beating for being "uppity," she made sure he heard every syllable of her carefully enunciated sentence. She let every bit of the teaching she had received that one winter from the colored teacher down from Fisk University linger in each word. Her children deserved to hear from their momma's own lips that they were more than a white man's insults.
Powerful stuff, but there's more.
How the author handles McNaughton and Annalaura's eventual "relationship" was skillful, because I truly had a problem with his selfishness regarding both his wife and Annalaura. But McNaughton is not just an over the top villain. We do see his softer side (though I did feel his falling in love with Annalaura was too swift, since it seemed based first and foremost on lust)
More pros on this novel:
The blacks and whites generally speak the same way. Yippee!! (No white characters speaking in refined english while the black character's dialogue is mangled so badly that you wonder how either of them managed to communicate with each other, and you just want to throw the book across the room because you can't make out what the heck the author's got them saying)
No character is saintly. Even Annalaura, though put into a terrible situation has no problem in implicating an innocent farm hand (though I think the character of Isaiah should have been played up more. I would have liked to see his emotions regarding McNaughton's relationship with Annalaura)
Eula, Alex McNaughton's wife. I both admired and sympathized with this character.
Alex McNaughton. Many of his actions were low down, but I didn't hate the character and I think that was a testament to the writer's skill. In the end I felt sympathy for him, but not much.
The first 180 pages or so, when the characters were introduced and Alex and Annalaura interacted with each other, and even having the children throughout were quite good. Weaving in children without them being annoying is a hard thing. I thought the story moved along well and the children were integrated into the plot good.
Sexual tension, especially when Alex made his move on an unwilling Annalaura was handled well. Now this was really hard to read, ande I suspect hard as heck to write. I commend the author for the restraint and directness in writing these scenes.
Peeves of mine:
I thought the character of Isaiah should have been played up more. I would have liked to have seen his emotions regarding McNaughton's relationship with Annalaura.
I couldn't get into John, Annalaura's husband. Maybe if he'd been introduced earlier and not just alluded to I could have felt for the character. But after leaving her and the kids, (even based on his reasons) I skipped over his chapters and had to go back and re-read the book a second time for his parts. I think Isaiah would have made a stronger character, but that's just me. John could have been killed off and it wouldn't have bothered me.
No tension in John and Alex's "meeting." though I know it was written to be just that. But I was hoping Alex wound up shooting John at that point.
Alex being there for the birth of the baby.
Maybe if it had been John being there for the delivery, it would have made his character more sympathetic.
As the novel was ending it got a bit too talky for me, but all in all I highly recommend this book. Considering the offerings coming out of major publishers who have copy editors, proof readers and all kinds of other editors available, for Amazon and the author to come out this thought provoking debut, well I just think if the author had shopped this to agents or publishers and they turned her down, then that highlights some of what's wrong with publishing today.
The lack of diversity in the publishing industry, when there's a book like this one that was available makes me pissed at the powers that be who acquire manuscripts. They need to be more inclusive!!
Okay, this is longer than I wanted, but I hope more people who've read the book come on and make comments, either for or against. This book deserves an audience!!
Summary of Page from a Tennessee JournalIt is 1913, shortly before the start of the First World War, and Annalaura is alone again. Her gambling, womanizing husband has left the plot they sharecrop in rural Tennessee ? why or for how long she does not know. Without food or money and with her future tied to the fate of the season?s tobacco crop, Annalaura struggles to raise her four children. When help comes in the form of an amorous landowner, who is she to turn it ? and him ? away? In this remarkable first novel, as bracingly original as it is exquisitely rendered, Francine Howard tells a moving story of American desire and ambition and the tragic, slippery boundaries of race under Jim Crow. ?Based on a true family story, this haunting first novel admirably revisits a painful time in history. Too often historical novels about women indulge in anachronistic explorations of feminism, but this novel admirably avoids that trap and instead portrays realistic characters dealing with their difficult lot in life.? ? Booklist Book Description: In Francine Howard?s stunning debut, Page from a Tennessee Journal, rural Tennessee of 1913 remains an unforgiving place for two couples--one black, the other white--who stumble against the rigid boundaries separating their worlds. When white farmer Alexander McNaughton falters into forbidden love with Annalaura Welles he discovers that he has much more to fear than the wrath of her returning gun-toting husband. Alexander?s wife ? flinty and pragmatic Eula Mae ?wages her own battle against the stoicism demanded of white women of her time and social standing. Former sharecropper John Welles, flush with cash from his year's sojourn working the poker tables in "the second best colored whorehouse in all of Nashville," wrestles with his devils as he struggles to assign blame for his wife's relationship with a white man. The convergence of the lives and choices of these fascinating characters? made from fear, pride, determination, spite, nobility and revenge ?leads to a heart-pounding and heartbreaking climax that feels at once original, audacious and inevitable. Amazon Exclusive: Zetta Elliot Interviews Francine Thomas Howard In this Amazon exclusive, we brought together AmazonEncore authors Zetta Elliott and Francine Thomas Howard to discuss Francine's first novel, Page from a Tennessee Journal. Zetta Elliott has spent the past 15 years studying, writing, and teaching. She earned her Ph.D. in American Studies from NYU in 2003 and has taught black feminist cultural criticism at Ohio University, Louisiana State University, and Mount Holyoke College. Her young adult novel, A Wish After Midnight, which explores race relations through the eyes of a contemporary teen displaced in Civil War-era Brooklyn, was published in February 2010. Read her exclusive interview with Francine Thomas Howard:
Zetta Elliott: There was a point early in the novel when I felt a pang of dread: Annalaura is a vulnerable black woman alone in the South and Alex is a powerful white man. As a writer of historical fiction, how do you get people to keep on reading when they feel they already know how this story ends? Francine Thomas Howard: It is my job as a writer to foreshadow for the reader that he or she does not know how the story ends. My most difficult challenge in writing Page from a Tennessee Journal was climbing inside the mind of a white man who had no hesitation about donning a bed sheet and sticking a pillowcase over his head to terrorize a black man. Very few of us see ourselves as evil, even when our actions are despicable. Everything Alexander McNaughton did made sense to him within the context of his world. Readers keep turning those pages because they want to know what will happen next. I believe it is the responsibility of the writer of historical fiction to challenge the reader to look beyond the stereotypes for the "rest of the story." Zetta Elliott: As a black feminist, there were times when I found it hard to hear white and black women in your novel giving each other not-so-sound marital advice. How do you think contemporary women will relate to the female characters you've created? Francine Thomas Howard: As much as we believe that contemporary women would think and choose differently from Aunt Becky and Fedora, I feel it?s important to remember that early 20th-century women were not privy to the array of options available to American women today. Our grandmothers and great-grandmothers were told often enough that men were the Bible-ordained heads of their households. Transport yourself back to the South of 1913 when white husbands could bed a woman of color with abandon. That they were committing adultery never entered their heads. Their world even permitted them to house their black families on the same property--sometimes even in the family home with his white wife and children. Those women, like Eula Mae, had no soft place to cry out their humiliation. They were told to bury it, pretend interracial love could never happen. Sadly, a searing cut to the heart like Eula suffered is something with which contemporary women can strongly identify. Zetta Elliott: What motivated you to make a white man--who is usually the villain in this kind of scenario--into a sympathetic character? Why should readers care about Alex McNaughton? Francine Thomas Howard: Precisely because the white man is usually portrayed as a one-dimensional villain. While I don't think Alex is any more worthy of sympathy than John Welles, I found it important to portray him against stereotype. Alex, like John, is a flawed man. But even people with flaws have redeeming qualities. Alexander saw himself as nothing out of the ordinary in his world--maybe even a tad smarter and less harsh than most of his contemporaries. His world granted him the right to bed a "colored" woman any time he chose. Hadn't it always been so? Unlike his crass in-laws, Alex saw himself as a man with higher moral standards. He had never forced a woman into his bed and he wasn't about to start with Annalaura. His trial came when that unexplainable spark flamed his heart into love for a black woman. The portrayal of Alexander McNaughton as a multi-faceted human being--the good and the bad--is critical to the reader's understanding that the Jim Crow rules laid down to keep blacks in our place also shackled whites. Zetta Elliott: Did you have any concerns about your unfavorable representation of John Welles? Other black women writers once faced a backlash from those who felt black men ought to be portrayed in a "positive" light. Did John have to be "bad" in order for Alex to look "good"? Francine Thomas Howard: I'm aware of the firestorm surrounding Alice Walker's The Color Purple and the character of Mister. But, of course, I don't see John Welles as "bad." Instead, I see him as a man of towering strength and determination. Early on, John declares that he cannot tolerate the indignity of reducing his family to life among the cows and pigs. He does everything in his power to provide a better existence for his family. His final sacrifice for the woman he loves and their children is the stuff of heroes. Is he flawed, and did he make bone-headed miscalculations in his goal to improve life for his family? You bet he did, but even heroes who float in the clouds have to put their feet on the ground sometimes. Is John "bad" compared to Alex's "good"? I think the reader will see that each man acted out of what he believed to be right, not only for himself but for those he loved. Neither required the other to determine their level of virtue. Zetta Elliott: Americans have varied experiences and attitudes about the past; we share a common history, yet everyone has a unique story to tell. What do you hope your novel will contribute to the American storytelling tradition? Francine Thomas Howard: It is my fervent hope that stories like Page from a Tennessee Journal will prompt the reader to take a closer look into black/white issues. In the past few years, dramatic events--Katrina, prominent murder trials, Obama's presidential campaign and election--have moved the country to the edges of real dialogue about our racial past. Yet we always pull back. The topic hurts too much. The surface reality of misery and horror with which we are all familiar is not only painful, it has become polarizing. Some Americans feel re-victimized and demoralized. Others resent what they feel is misplaced guilt-by-association. Books that peel back that first ugly layer of our past to take a deeper look into the years of slavery and Jim Crow have the opportunity of inching the two sides toward sustained dialogue. I hope that stories like the intertwined lives of Annalaura, John, Alex, and Eula can push that agenda forward. Read more of the conversation between Zetta and Francine on Omnivoracious, the Amazon books blog.
Historical Books
|
 |