 |
The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil War by Stephen Budiansky
Book Summary InformationAuthor: Stephen Budiansky Edition: Paperback Audio: English (Unknown); English (Original Language); English (Published) Published: 2008-12-30 ISBN: 0452290163 Number of pages: 336 Publisher: Plume
Book Reviews of The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil WarBook Review: Ultimately - The Union Lost The Civil War Summary: 4 Stars
Stephen Budiansky has written an interesting account of the post-Civil War Reconstruction era. Budiansky reminds us that from 1865 until 1877 the United States essentially fought an insurgency in the American South. And the sad fact is, that the United States lost the insurgency to the Confederacy.
The Bloody Shirt is not a straightforward history of the era but rather follows the lives and careers of several people involved in this insurgency. Through these people's stories we gain an understanding of the wider insurgency and the mistakes made by the Union which allowed the Confederacy to overturn the gains won in the Civil War and continue on their way of life.
The book focuses on people like; Albert Morgan, who was assigned as a soldier to police the Reconstruction South and later became a state senator from Mississippi, Lewis Merrill who commanded troops in reconstruction South Carolina, Adelbert Ames, also a soldier, who became the appointed governor of Mississippi, and Prince Rivers, a former slave who fought for the Union and became a county magistrate in South Carolina. Also making an appearance is General James Longstreet, the brilliant Confederate commander who later became a Republican and advocated the Union cause.
These men confront the enormously difficult challenge of trying to change a hostile culture. This culture, which could not bring itself to admit wrongdoing or guilt in any of its activities, resisted the attempt to enfranchise the black population with the rights of citizenship granted to them under the 14th 15th and 16th amendments to the Constitution.
What is lost to most modern Americans is the fact that this was truly a violent insurgency. Over 3000 people were killed after the United States raised the "Mission Accomplished" banner at Appomattox. Any black who attempted to assert their citizenship or white Republican who sought to enforce the law was a target. Arrayed against them were wide variety of terroristic paramilitary groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, who killed elected legislators, executives, newspaper people and ordinary men and women. They stole elections by the grossest and basest means possible and did not even try to hide the fact. They shot and hung people with abandon, and openly threatened the rest.
The descriptions of the activities of these terror groups shocks the conscience.
All the while, the heroic figures charged with rebuilding the culture had neither enough men, arms or authority to accomplish their mission. After four years of civil war, popular support for the reconstruction effort dwindled precipitously. The people of the United States were tired and they wanted it to be *over.* They wanted things to go back to *normal.*
Does any of this sound familiar?
Tragically instead of doubling down and developing new strategies to enforce cultural change in the American South and allocating the proper amount of resources needed for the task - the Union eventually withdrew, leaving the people left behind, blacks and white Republicans, to their own devices. They did not last long. The long night of despotism continued into the 20th century, up until the 1950s and 60s.
Of particular interest is the fact that Budiansky notes that the Confederacy not only won the insurgency in the South but completely rewrote the history of the Civil War and Reconstruction. The one thing the Southerners could not accept was that their culture had been fatally flawed. This is a common trait of pre-modern cultures and is well exemplified in a letter written by General Longstreet to the New Orleans Times that got him in hot water with his compatriots and generally considered a traitor to his tribe for 100 years:
He began by saying he was speaking with the plain and honest convictions of a soldier he said that as he thought, the South had fought, and fought well, but had lost; they were a conquered people. It was accordingly their duty to accept the terms of the victor. Even if they were in a position to resist, it would be wrong to do so. He himself had lost his rights of citizenship under the Reconstruction acts, as someone who had sworn an oath of allegiance to the union and then engaged in rebellion, "but that was one of the hazards of revolution, and I have no better cause of complaint and those who have lost their slaves." To claim now that Southerners need not concede anything to the victor was tantamount to claiming they had not known what they were fighting for in the first place. He hoped he might be forgiven the "bluntness of the soldier" to remind his fellow Southerners what had been decided at Appomattox. "The surrender of the Confederate armies in 1865," he wrote, "involved; 1. the surrender of the claim to the right of secession. 2. the surrender of the former political relations of the Negro. 3. the surrender of the Southern Confederacy. These issues expired upon the fields last occupied by the Confederate armies and there tthey should have been buried. The soldier prefers to have the sod that receives him when he falls cover his remains. The political questions of the war should have been buried upon the fields that marked their end."
In this, Longstreet was remarkable man for his time and culture. And it points out an interesting question. Why is it that modern cultures promote the concept of settlement? The feelings prevalent in the Confederate culture are the norm for humanity. All pre-modern cultures do not privilege settlement. Meaning that there is never a settlement to any particular issue - there is only a standing status quo. And the status quo will hold until the correlation of forces shifts and privileges another party. In the pre-modern world, the negotiation is never over. Once a position has been reached, it is merely a stepping off point for the next round of negotiations. But in the modern culture, the Enlightenment-based cultures, high-priority is given to final settlement of contentious issues. How is it that we have evolved this trait?
Summary of The Bloody Shirt: Terror After the Civil WarA gripping look at terrorist violence during the Reconstruction era
Between 1867, when the defeated South was forced to establish new state governments that fully represented both black and white citizens, and 1877, when the last of these governments was overthrown, more than three thousand African Americans and their white allies were killed by terrorist violence. Drawing on original letters and diaries as well as published racist diatribes of the time, acclaimed historian Stephen Budiansky concentrates his vivid, fast paced narrative on the efforts of five heroic men?two Union officers, a Confederate general, a Northern entrepreneur, and a former slave?who showed remarkable idealism and courage as they struggled to establish a ?New South? in the face of overwhelming hatred and organized resistance. The Bloody Shirt sheds new light on the violence, racism, division, and heroism of Reconstruction, a largely forgotten but epochal chapter in American history.
19th Century Books
|
 |
Andrew Jackson: Symbol for an Age (Galaxy Books)by John William Ward Oxford University Press, USA; Published: 1962-12-31; Paperback; BookBest price: $4.00Price in other shops: $19.99
The Oregon Trail (Oxford World's Classics)by Francis Parkman Jr. Oxford University Press, USA; Published: 2000-03; Paperback; BookBest price: $3.99Price in other shops: $11.95
A Slave No More: Two Men Who Escaped to Freedom, Including Their Own Narratives of Emancipationby David W. Blight Ph. D. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; Published: 2007-11-05; Hardcover; BookBest price: $1.00Price in other shops: $25.00
Sea of Glory: America's Voyage of Discovery, the U.S. Exploring Expedition, 1838-1842by Nathaniel Philbrick Penguin Audio; Published: 2003-11-10; Audio Cassette; BookBest price: $1.07Price in other shops: $39.95
The Santa Fe Trail: Its History, Legends, and Loreby David Dary Penguin (Non-Classics); Published: 2002-02-26; Paperback; BookBest price: $14.32Price in other shops: $17.00
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates: The First Complete, Unexpurgated Textby Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Arnold Douglas, Harold Holzer Harpercollins; Published: 1993-02; Hardcover; BookBest price: $49.79
The War With Spain in 1898 (The Macmillan Wars of the United States)by David F. Trask Free Pr; Published: 1981-06; Hardcover; BookPrice in other shops: $45.00
The Complete Idiot's Guide to the Old Westby Mike Flanagan Alpha; Published: 1999-07-13; Mass Market Paperback; BookBest price: $57.44
Gone to Texas: A History of the Lone Star Stateby Randolph B. Campbell Oxford University Press, USA; Published: 2004-02-12; Paperback; BookBest price: $40.00Price in other shops: $44.95
Roughing It (The Penguin American Library)by Mark Twain Penguin Classics; Published: 1981-12-17; Paperback; BookBest price: $8.65Price in other shops: $16.00
|
|